Schedule Compression Techniques in Project Management

Sometimes, projects face delays. Approvals might arrive late, materials could be delayed, or unexpected issues may slow progress. To make up for lost time without changing the project deliverables, project managers apply schedule compression techniques.

The two main techniques are Crashing and Fast Tracking.

1. Crashing

Crashing involves adding extra resources, such as workers, machines, or money, to speed up critical tasks in the project. 

Example:  

A flyover in Bengaluru is falling behind schedule. To finish on time, the contractor:

- Brings in 50 extra workers,  

- Uses more cranes,  

- Pays overtime for night shifts.  

The project finishes faster, but costs increase.

Pros:  

- Cuts time effectively.  

- Keeps the project on schedule.  

Cons:  

- Raises costs.  

- Not useful if new resources can’t be added, especially in tasks like design.

2. Fast Tracking

Fast tracking entails doing tasks simultaneously that were originally planned sequentially.

Example:  

For a new office building in Gurugram:

The team typically completes all electrical work before starting interior design.  

With fast tracking, the design team begins work on finished floors while electricians are still working on others.  

This approach saves time but raises risks, such as workers getting in each other’s way or needing to redo work.

Pros:  

- Speeds up the project without additional costs, if managed well.  

- Effective when multiple activities can overlap.  

Cons:  

- Raises the risk of mistakes.  

- May lead to rework if dependent tasks collide.

Final Word

Schedule compression is like a shortcut, but it requires careful planning.

Crashing means spending more to save time.

Fast Tracking involves doing tasks in parallel to save time.  

Project managers make choices based on priorities: budget or risk. Using these techniques wisely helps projects stay on track and meet deadlines without sacrificing quality.